I know that it can be hard translating a Seuss book, usually with only 20 or 30 pages, into a feature film is a tough task. Also, as I said earlier, one musical number completely ruins the tragic mood it tried to set with the trees getting chopped down.
I can't remember any of it and i just got out 20 minutes ago. I'm not against musicals, but the combined fact that 1.) i wasn't prepared for that (Despicable Me, their previous movie, had none) and 2.) the music was. Perhaps because I have no soul.Īlso, it's apparently a musical, something that the ads failed to mention. At one point the romantic interest actually says 'Wow, how cool is your grandmother'. Not sure how, but it makes me wonder - if that's all it took, why didn't Once-ler try to plant the seed 15 years ago?Īlso, they throw in a 'hip grandmother' pretty much entirely because they know grandparents will be taking their kid. Apparently in the last 15 or so years nobody had even once looked outside.) Additionally, when he finally plants the seed, all the other trees start growing again. I just feel the ending would have been far more dramatically appropriate if, instead of having a cliché'd (and underwhelming) chase scene where he shows everybody O'hare is evil, if he instead needed to actually CONVINCE people that trees were worth caring about (he convinces them by knocking down a wall at the end. I'm not going to say that big businessmen shouldn't be villains or anything like that, but the point of the original book was that all of mankind had stopped caring, whereas the movie says it's the fault of Once-ler and O'hare entirely, the latter of who deliberately is keeping people clueless about trees. In the movie, it's basically all because of some horribly stereotyped evil characters - Once-ler himself is painted as naive but still a good person, but the creators apparently didn't want him to seem corrupt in chopping down all the trees so they have his redneck family do it for him.
It's a case where the book was more dramatic than the story - nature had been ravaged, and nobody cared about it except for one boy. Unfortunately, the part of the story focusing on the boy trying to find a tree was tiresome. You should be upset that the Lorax leaves us, but I was more upset that I WASN'T upset. That is, with the exception of a badly placed musical number, which makes any sorrow at the trees being destroyed seem diluted. Danny Devito does a great job as the Lorax, and I feel it's pretty safe to say that the parts of the story actually focusing on the Lorax himself were indeed enjoyable. Naturally, the art style is fantastic and whimsical, as all Seuss work is. Let me get the good parts out of the way first. The movie, on the other hand, left me thoroughly unimpressed. As a kid, I loved the bittersweet end, as it got the message across and made me want to care about preserving nature. It's a charming yet somewhat depressing book as the main character realizes what he's destroyed, yet leaves a glimmer of hope at the end as he passes off the last tree seed to a young boy to plant. If you were ever a child, you are probably familiar with Doctor Seuss's 'The Lorax', a tale of a world where man's greed and selfishness has eradicated all the trees in favor of their escapist man-made town. The other later accused us of never having been kids. Throughout the movie, one of them kept groaning and sighing at the same parts I did. My vote is six.I went to see this movie with two girl friends of mine. This remake disguised in prequel is not totally bad, but follows the format of the present Hollywood movies, supported by special effects but without the atmosphere and the psychological horror of the 1982 movie. The story of a shape-shifting alien that can assume any human form is tense, supported by a claustrophobic and depressing scenario, paranoid characters with Kurt Russell in the top of his successful career, haunting music score by Ennio Morricone and John Carpenter's top-notch direction. In 1982, the master John Carpenter remade the 1951 "The Thing from Another World" ans his movie has become a masterpiece. Kate finds means to identify the creature, but maybe it is too late to save the team members. Out of the blue, the alien revives and attack the scientists, contaminating them and assuming the shape of his victim. They find a frozen alien life form nearby and they bring to their facility for research.
On the arrival, she learns that they have discovered a spacecraft deep below in the ice. Sander Halvorson (Ulrich Thomsen) invites the paleontologist Kate Lloyd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) to join his team in his research in the Artic.
0 kommentar(er)
